Impaired driving remains one of the most serious and preventable dangers on U.S. roads. To address this, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recently launched “Pathways to Safer Streets,” its most comprehensive road safety initiative to date.
This effort focuses on the leading causes of traffic deaths, including impaired driving, speeding, distracted driving, and not wearing seat belts, using data and coordinated strategies to save lives.
One important tool within this effort is the Impaired Driving Tracking System (IDTS). States have recognized the value of tracking impaired-driving cases from arrest through adjudication. Yet progress has been uneven, and many systems have struggled.
The release of NHTSA’s Guide for Implementing an Impaired Driving Tracking System in January 2026 marks a turning point.

From Concept to Sustainable Practice
What makes this guide different is its shift in focus. Earlier guidance emphasized what an IDTS should look like. The 2026 Guide emphasizes how states can realistically build, sustain, and use these systems over time.
This evolution is informed by more than a decade of state experience, incorporating lessons from systems that succeeded as well as those that did not.
What’s New and Innovative in the 2026 Guide
Several changes stand out for professionals working in impaired-driving prevention and data systems:
- Sustainability is the priority
The Guide highlights legislative backing, dedicated funding, and ongoing training as core requirements, not optional.
- Multiple system models are acknowledged
Rather than promoting a one-size-fits-all solution, the Guide supports standalone, integrated, and decentralized systems, with practical guidance for each.
- Central coordination is essential
Successful IDTSs consistently rely on a lead agency responsible for data quality, accountability, and long-term maintenance.
- Data use matters as much as data collection
The Guide emphasizes performance measurement (such as tracking recidivism, evaluating countermeasures, and identifying system gaps) rather than simply compiling records.
- Real-world barriers are addressed directly
Common challenges like staff turnover, inconsistent reporting, data quality issues, and funding constraints are paired with actionable solutions.
- Readiness tools are included
States are provided with checklists and self-assessment questions to evaluate legislative authority, data integration, reporting capacity, and interoperability before implementation.

Why This Matters Now
This guidance is released alongside NHTSA’s Pathways to Safer Streets initiative. Within this framework, IDTS is no longer a standalone data project. It is positioned as foundational for impaired-driving enforcement, policy evaluation, and prevention.
The Takeaway for the Field
The question is no longer “Should we build an IDTS?”. It is “How do we make it work and last?”
The 2026 Guide reflects a realistic approach to impaired-driving data: one that prioritizes coordination, sustainability, and meaningful use. For states and practitioners, it offers a clearer path forward and a renewed opportunity to turn data into action that saves lives.
Sources:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2026a). Guide for Implementing an Impaired Driving Tracking System. NHTSA. https://www.nhtsa.gov/guide-implementing-impaired-driving-tracking-system
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2026b). Pathways to Safer Streets: A National Traffic Safety Action Plan. NHTSA. https://www.nhtsa.gov/pathways-to-safer-streets
Noble, B. (2026, April 25). NHTSA unveils new road safety program targeting speeding, impaired driving and seat belt use. EMS1. https://www.ems1.com/vehicle-crashes/nhtsa-launches-sweeping-new-road-safety-campaign-targeting-top-causes-of-traffic-deaths
Okyere, D. K., Dexter, C., Galadima, E., Elqutob, K., & Murdoch, J. (2026, February). Guide for implementing an impaired driving tracking system. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

